Wellows vs Peec AI (2026)
Wellows counts citations and turns gaps into outreach and drafts on a published answer balance. Peec AI tracks prompt-level visibility on plans whose prices we could not re-verify. Wellows wins; here's the full read.
Peec AI and Wellows get compared because both sell to marketing teams and agencies who want to know how often AI engines surface their brand. They measure different things. Wellows is built on citations: which sources an engine linked, and whether any of them are yours or talk about you. Peec AI is built on prompts: you pick the questions, and it scores visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice for each one against competitors.
Wellows facts are from wellows.com/pricing and its llms.txt (updated 23 September 2026), as recorded in our catalog on 25 October. Peec AI facts are from its catalog entry, which includes a read of its pricing page on 24 October 2026. Promptwatch facts are from promptwatch.com/llms.txt, checked 21 October.
Quick verdict
Wellows comes out ahead. Its price ladder is public and verified, all five of its engines are on the cheapest plan, and it does something with a gap instead of just reporting it. Peec AI is a tidy prompt tracker, but we could not confirm what it costs today, and the model coverage at each tier is part of that uncertainty.
Neither is our top pick. That is Promptwatch, for reasons covered at the end.
The comparison table
| Wellows | Peec AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Core metric | Citation share vs competitors; explicit and implicit citations | Per-prompt visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice |
| Plans | Basic, Standard, Growth, Scale, Custom | Starter, Pro, Advanced, Enterprise (custom), plus an agent with credits |
| Entry price | $29/mo, verified 25 Oct | $95/mo Starter in older notes; not re-verified on 24 Oct |
| Billing unit | Monthly balance of AI answers (1,800 to 36,000) | Not confirmed on the 24 Oct read |
| Engines at entry | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini | Three models per tier in older notes; Claude and DeepSeek Enterprise-only; no Grok |
| Projects and seats | Unlimited on every plan | One project on Starter in older notes |
| Turning gaps into work | Quick Wins, Content Opportunities, KIVA drafts, Outreach contacts | Gap analysis named on pricing page |
| Crawler and referral data | Not published | Crawl insights and AI referrals named; depth not documented |
| API | Limited reporting API | MCP and API named on pricing page |
| Trial | 7 days on every plan | Not on our listing |
Pricing: one side is knowable
This is the biggest practical gap. Wellows publishes four plans and one rule: one AI answer is one prompt, asked of one engine, on one day. Basic gives 1,800 a month, Standard ($97) 6,500, Growth ($249) 18,000 and Scale ($497) 36,000. You can work out what a prompt set costs before talking to anyone. Forty prompts on all five engines every day is 6,000 answers a month, which is Standard.
Peec AI's pricing page, read on 24 October, names its tiers but the figures did not render in what we captured. Our older notes put Starter at $95 a month for 50 prompts, three models and one project, with extra models at $35 to $165 each and Claude and DeepSeek reserved for Enterprise. None of that is re-verified. If those terms still hold, a team that wants five or six engines pays well above sticker. If they've changed, you'll only find out on the live page or a call. Either way, you can't budget it from here.
What each measures well
Peec's prompt-level view is clean. For each tracked question you see where you rank in the answer, how the tone reads, and what share of voice you hold against named rivals. That is a good fit for a brand manager who reports a short list of hero prompts every week.
Wellows asks a different question: when the engine linked sources, were you among them? It separates explicit citations (your own page) from implicit ones (a review site, roundup or forum thread that mentions you). That split matters because the fixes differ. An explicit gap is a content job. An implicit gap is an outreach job, and Wellows hands you the list: cited third-party pages that never mention you, with contact emails and a template, and Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, Medium and Quora listed apart from publishers. Each cited page that does mention you is tagged positive, neutral or negative, so sentiment points at a page you can open.
Peec does name gap analysis on its pricing page. We have no detail on what it outputs.
Where Peec has the edge
Two places, and both are worth checking in a demo. Peec's pricing page names MCP and API access, while Wellows lists only a limited reporting API (Looker Studio, Databox, Whatagraph) and no MCP server. Peec also names crawl insights and AI referrals; Wellows publishes neither. We can't say how deep Peec's versions go. Our entry also notes Peec has no historical backfill, so competitor baselines start on the day you subscribe.
Who should pick which
- Agency with many small clients: Wellows. Unlimited projects and seats on one balance, white-label reporting on every plan.
- Team whose next step after a gap is outreach or a draft: Wellows, for the Outreach list and KIVA.
- Brand manager reporting a fixed set of hero prompts, who wants position and share of voice per prompt: Peec AI can do that job. Confirm the current price and model mix first.
- Anyone who needs Claude or Copilot: neither as published. Wellows doesn't track them, and Peec's older notes put Claude behind Enterprise.
The stronger pick than both
Both tools leave the same question open: why did the engine pick that page, and was the citation worth anything? Promptwatch publishes those layers. Agent Analytics reads AI crawler logs from your CDN (Cloudflare, CloudFront, Fastly, Vercel, Netlify and others), with a crawl-to-citation path and error tracking, from Professional at $245 a month and on every agency plan. Visitor analytics ties AI-referred sessions to conversions through a small script or a GTM template. Every paid plan runs ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot and Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, with MCP and REST API access.
Citation analytics go to page and domain level, with Reddit and YouTube broken out and trends over time, so you keep most of what makes Wellows useful. Prompts carry search volumes and difficulty scores, which Wellows chooses not to publish and Peec doesn't document. Explore is free for 10 ChatGPT prompts; Essential is $95 a month with a 7-day trial.
If you are choosing between these two, take Wellows. If you can widen the shortlist, run the Promptwatch trial first with the same prompts, and see what the crawler and conversion data change about your priorities.