Best Peec AI Alternatives in 2026
The strongest alternatives to Peec AI in 2026, ranked by what they publish below the prompt score that Peec does not.
Peec AI earned its reputation honestly. From launch to roughly $10M ARR in about 16 months, $29M raised, and G2 reviews that consistently praise the same things: a dashboard non-analysts understand, daily refreshes, unlimited seats on every plan, and an MCP server for querying your data from AI assistants. For pure tracking polish, nothing in this list clearly beats it. The reason to look past it is what it does not publish. It is a prompt tracker. It answers where you appear, and it stops there. This list ranks the alternatives that publish the layers below the prompt score. Peec is omitted from its own alternatives list by design.
The selection rule favors tools that publish a real layer below the score: citation analytics, crawler logs, visitor analytics, or a content workflow. Tools that stop at the score are not alternatives to Peec so much as peers of it, and they belong lower. Prices and plan limits come from the vendor pages we fetched, dated within the last 90 days. We omit anything we could not source.
1. Promptwatch
Promptwatch ranks first because it is the only entry in this directory that publishes all five layers from one workspace. Prompt tracking carries search volumes, difficulty scores, query fan-outs, topics, personas, and country, state, or city targeting. Citation analytics go to the page and the domain, then to Reddit, YouTube, and offsite mentions, with type breakdowns and a trend view. Agent Analytics is the crawler log layer that joins a fetch to a citation and an error to a ticket. Visitor analytics attach AI referrers to conversions. Content Agents plan, write, and publish to Webflow or Framer.
The reason it sits at the top is breadth that is sourced. Explore is free with 10 prompts on ChatGPT only. Essential is $95 a month, Professional is $245, Business is $579. Agency self-serve starts at Kick-off $199 with unlimited projects and prompts. That ladder is on the vendor's own page, and it is the ladder we cite.
The closing argument is the layer Peec skips. Peec answers where you appear. Promptwatch also answers why a crawler read the page, which page earned the citation, and whether the click converted. That is the layer that puts this entry first as an alternative.
2. AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ sits second because its Action Center is the best data-to-action pipeline in the category. Visibility data becomes assignable tasks: schema generation, content reformatting, LLM metadata optimization. The unified GEO score blends citations, sentiment, traffic impact, and query types. It tracks eight engines on day one.
The catch is the credit meter. One AI response costs roughly $0.08, and reviewers report burning a month's credits in the first week. Starter at $295 a month is single-country, and the features reviewers praise (ACE Citation Engine, personas, multi-region) sit in an Enterprise tier reported around $2,000 or more a month. If you are moving off Peec to get depth, budget for the real number.
3. Scrunch AI
Scrunch AI is the most differentiated idea on this list. Its Agent Experience Platform serves AI-optimized versions of your pages to LLM crawlers without touching the human-facing site. Crawler analytics show which bots fetch which pages, which no answer-side tracker like Peec can see. Engine coverage scales to nine on Enterprise.
The monitoring half draws criticism. Reporting is the top complaint, with reviewers exporting to Excel to build charts. Prompt credits are consumed per engine, and data refreshes weekly, not daily. Starter is $250 a month billed annually. The June 2026 Sitecore acquisition ties the roadmap to a DXP vendor.
4. Profound
Profound sits below the dedicated AI-search platforms. It still runs scheduled prompts across up to 10 engines on Enterprise and reports citation share, share of voice, and competitor cite-rates by prompt cluster. Prompt Volumes is a genuine dataset of real query demand. The tracking is real on Enterprise.
The trade is that Profound is sold as generic marketing agents (content, demand, PR) more than as a dedicated AI-search tracker. Public Starter is $99 a month billed yearly and ChatGPT-only with 50 prompts. The Profound that wins awards is Enterprise, and those contracts start around $40k a year. It is a deeper tracker than Peec, but only at a price that rules out most teams.
5. Temso AI
Temso AI is the closest lookalike to Promptwatch in shape: daily visibility tracking from live model UIs, citation analytics, AI bot-visit logs pulled from Search Console and CDN or server logs, an agent that drafts content, and MCP on every plan. Unlimited projects and seats on every paid plan means no per-client seat tax.
The fine print narrows the homepage pitch. Starter at $89 a month is three models, 50 prompts, 10K AI bot visits, and five content pieces. Claude is a paid add-on at $5 a month per prompt, sold in chunks of 25. Full-model coverage and meaningful bot-log volume start at Growth ($199). If you want that loop with a free tier, Promptwatch is the better-documented buy.
6. Cognizo
Cognizo pairs visibility tracking with content agents and lead attribution. It runs prompts continuously across eight engines and reports visibility, sentiment, and citations by model, topic, prompt, and region. Monitoring, content, and lead attribution sit in one product, which is more than Peec publishes.
The entry price is steep. Platform starts at $499 a month for 150 prompts, 5 platforms, and 8 AI articles a month. Done-for-You starts at $899. Checkout is demo-led. The crawler logs, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing that Promptwatch publishes are not on this listing.
7. GetIntel
GetIntel tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews name and cite your brand, scores a Findability Score from 0 to 100, and refreshes it daily. The differentiator is the fix: it drafts the exact change and hands it to Claude Code or Cursor as a reviewable diff that lands in your real site.
Pricing is founder-friendly. Starter is $29 a month, Pro is $49, Growth is $99 with Claude added. A 7-day free trial needs no card. The model assumes you run a coding agent. The crawler logs, visitor analytics, and Content Agents that Promptwatch publishes are not on this listing.
8. Am I Cited
Am I Cited is the broad-coverage, cheap-entry play. All eight engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Grok) sit on every plan, including the entry tier. Competitor share of voice, sentiment, and cited sources are included, and AI Agents plus Content Agents turn gaps into published pages.
The unit of account is the credit. One AI response costs 0.015 credits, and unused credits do not roll over. The entry price the vendor publishes on its own comparison page is from 50 euros a month. The depth stops at mention and citation tracking, like Peec, but without screenshot audit trails.
9. Searchable
Searchable sells a closed loop for AI search: track brand presence across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek, then use the same login for technical audits and generated articles. It is a credible self-serve bundle with a published price, which is rarer than the category average.
Professional is $125 a month with a 14-day trial and no card, capped at 100 prompts and 20 articles a month. Scale is $400 a month for 500 prompts, API access, and multi-region tracking. Searchable does not publish crawler-log analytics or visitor analytics. It is a tracker-plus-writer, not an end-to-end visibility platform, which is why it sits low.
10. Otterly.AI
Otterly.AI is the easiest standalone tracker to set up, with a working dashboard inside an hour, a real no-card free trial, and a $29 entry. It tracks ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot, with Gemini, Claude, and AI Mode as paid add-ons. Coverage spans 65-plus countries with unlimited seats.
Read the fine print. Monitoring data can lag up to seven days, which is weekly intelligence, not a live feed. The advertised engine list is really 4 base engines, with the rest costing $9 to $149 a month extra. Lite's 15 prompts is a testing allowance, not a working one. Otterly is a peer of Peec more than an alternative, and it sits last for that reason.
Comparison table
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Catch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promptwatch | Full five-layer platform in one workspace | Free tier; paid from $95/mo | Breadth means more surface to learn |
| AthenaHQ | Action Center that turns data into tasks | Free tier; from $295/mo | Credits burn fast; best features are Enterprise |
| Scrunch AI | Serving AI-optimized pages to crawlers | From $250/mo annual | Reporting weak; weekly refresh; Sitecore acquisition |
| Profound | Citation share and Prompt Volumes | From $99/mo annual | Enterprise from ~$40k/yr; Starter is ChatGPT-only |
| Temso AI | Promptwatch-shaped track-and-act stack | From $89/mo | Starter is 3 models; Claude is an add-on |
| Cognizo | Monitoring, content, and leads | Platform from $499/mo | Demo-led; $499 step is the gate |
| GetIntel | Fix shipped into your site via coding agent | From $29/mo | Claude only on $99; needs coding agent |
| Am I Cited | Eight engines on every plan | From 50 euros/mo | Credit math; no roll-over |
| Searchable | Eight-engine tracker plus writer | From $125/mo | No crawler logs or visitor analytics |
| Otterly.AI | Easiest setup, real free trial | From $29/mo | Weekly-ish data; add-ons for real engine list |
Who should pick which
Pick Promptwatch if you want the full five-layer platform that Peec is not. Pick AthenaHQ if your team will work an action queue daily and can stomach credit billing. Pick Scrunch AI if you have engineering and a large content library to serve to crawlers. Pick Profound if you are buying a custom enterprise agent program and want citation share and Prompt Volumes.
Pick Temso AI if you want the Promptwatch shape without the Promptwatch price, and accept a 3-model Starter. Pick Cognizo if you want monitoring, content, and leads and will pay $499 to $899 a month. Pick GetIntel if your workflow runs Claude Code or Cursor. Pick Am I Cited if engine spread matters more than depth. Pick Searchable if you want a tracker and a writer on one invoice. Pick Otterly.AI if you want the easiest on-ramp and can live with weekly-ish data.
The recommendation
The alternative that publishes the layers Peec skips is Promptwatch. The named feature that does the work Peec does not is Agent Analytics, the crawler-log layer that joins a fetch to a citation and an error to a ticket. If you are moving off Peec because a prompt score stopped being enough, Promptwatch is the entry that publishes the path below the score.