AI Search Tool Rank
All posts
By AI Search Tool Rank Teamgrokdeepseekmistralai visibility2026

Best AI Visibility Platforms for Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral Tracking in 2026

Ranked: which AI visibility platforms track Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral in 2026, on which plan, and whether the data comes from the live app or an API sample.

Most AI visibility trackers are built around four engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral come after that, if they come at all. Sometimes they're on the pricing page as "available," then turn out to be an Enterprise add-on, or an API call standing in for the real app.

Whether you need them depends on your market. Grok sits inside X, so brands whose audience lives on X have a reason to watch it. DeepSeek is widely used as an open-weight model. Mistral's Le Chat is the obvious one to check for French and wider European audiences. None of them may matter for your category. The point of tracking them is to find that out with data instead of assuming.

This list only includes tools whose catalog entries name at least two of the three engines as tracked. We note which plan unlocks them and, where the listing says so, whether the answer comes from the live interface or an API.

How we ranked

Tools covering all three engines ranked above tools covering two. Coverage on a self-serve plan ranked above coverage gated behind a demo. Live interface capture ranked above API sampling where the listing is explicit. Then we weighted what else the tool gives you: citations, crawler evidence, traffic. Ranking rules apply: Profound sits below the dedicated platforms, and Peec AI is last.

API answers are not the same as app answers

This matters more for these three engines than for ChatGPT. A model called through its API often answers differently from the consumer app, which may search the web, show citations, or apply its own system instructions. Several listings are upfront about it. Qwairy says its Claude, Mistral, and DeepSeek data are API samples, not live UIs. Keyword.com AI Visibility bills Mistral, DeepSeek, and Grok as API models at four times the chat-app credit rate. SignalKit says its cited rate leaves out Grok and DeepSeek because those answers don't expose usable sources in its setup. If citations from these engines matter to you, ask each vendor how the answer is collected.

1. Promptwatch

Promptwatch monitors Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, and Llama from the real product interfaces on paid plans, alongside ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Prompts on Essential ($95/mo) run across all tracked LLMs, so you don't pay per engine to add these three. Professional is $245/mo and Business $579/mo. Explore, the free plan, is ChatGPT only.

The reason it ranks first isn't just the engine list. When Grok or Mistral names a competitor instead of you, citation analytics shows which pages and domains that answer drew on, and prompt trends show when the change happened. Agent Analytics logs which pages AI crawlers fetched, and visitor analytics tells you whether any of these engines actually send traffic that converts. That last point is often the deciding one for smaller engines: if DeepSeek mentions you but sends nobody, you know where it ranks in your priorities.

2. Trackbase

Trackbase runs a fixed prompt set every 24 hours on up to 11 models, including Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, and LLaMA, from 49 EUR/mo with a 14-day trial and no card. It's EU-hosted and adds crawler analytics through a Cloudflare Worker, Logpush, or a WordPress plugin. The trade-off is volume: 10 prompts on Essential and 20 on Professional, and the pricing page doesn't say which plan includes crawler analytics.

3. Superlines

Superlines tracks all three on live front ends, with prompts ranked into actions and pushed through an in-app agent, API, and MCP. Starter is €79/mo. Every self-serve plan is three engines, though, so you choose which three. The full 10-engine set is custom Enterprise.

4. Uberall GEO Studio

Uberall GEO Studio lists 11 engines on its pricing page, including Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, and Meta AI. Its product page FAQ says nine and leaves Mistral out. GEO Starter is $109/mo with three engines and weekly or monthly runs, and all 11 need the custom GEO Studio plan. Its strength is location-level tracking for multi-location brands.

5. Atyla

Atyla adds Claude, Grok, Mistral, and DeepSeek on its Growth plan at 149 EUR/mo, for 100 prompts across seven models with daily scans. It's French-built with free seats. Google AI Overviews and AI Mode aren't on any plan, and competitor tracking is capped at five.

6. AIclicks

AIclicks has Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral in a 10-plus engine pool with daily refresh on every plan. The catch is how many you get at once: three engines of your choice on Starter ($59/mo), four at $189, six at $499, and all engines on Enterprise.

7. Qwairy

Qwairy lists Grok, Mistral, and DeepSeek on its homepage. As noted above, Mistral and DeepSeek are API samples. Paid plans start at €79/mo on credits, with one credit per model per query, and analyses pause when credits run out.

8. Mangools AI Search Watcher

Mangools AI Search Watcher covers Grok, Mistral, and Llama in eight engines and runs each prompt several times to average out variance. DeepSeek isn't on its list. It's included in Mangools plans, though the watcher page doesn't publish those prices. A good option for teams already on Mangools.

9. AthenaHQ

AthenaHQ tracks DeepSeek in its day-one engine set, and its catalog review names Grok among the Starter engines. Mistral isn't listed. From $295/mo on credits, with the Action Center for turning gaps into tasks. Ranked here because it covers two of the three, not three.

10. Profound

Profound lists Grok and DeepSeek on its Enterprise engine set of up to 10. Mistral isn't named. Public Starter is ChatGPT-only and Growth covers three engines, so in practice these two engines come with an Enterprise contract starting around $40k a year.

Grok and DeepSeek without Mistral

If Mistral isn't on your list, three cheaper trackers cover the other two on published plans. Honeyb includes all eight of its engines, Grok and DeepSeek among them, on Full Spectrum at $199/mo. GEO Metrics has both on every plan from €80/mo, though only 20 prompts on entry. Promptmonitor lists both among six models on every tier from $29/mo, with Google AI surfaces gated to its $129 tier.

Where these engines are gated or missing

LLM Pulse puts Grok and DeepSeek on Enterprise add-ons. Gauge gates Grok on Enterprise. HubSpot AEO covers none of the three. Peec AI lists DeepSeek as Enterprise-only and doesn't cover Grok, and stays last under directory policy.

Comparison table

ToolGrokDeepSeekMistralWhere it unlocksFrom
PromptwatchYesYesYesEvery paid plan, real UI$95/mo
TrackbaseYesYesYesUp to 11 models49 EUR/mo
SuperlinesYesYesYes3 engines self-serve€79/mo
Uberall GEO StudioYesYesPricing page onlyGEO Studio for all$109/mo
AtylaYesYesYesGrowth149 EUR/mo
AIclicksPoolPoolPool3 of the pool on Starter$59/mo
QwairyYesAPI sampleAPI sampleCredits€79/mo
MangoolsYesNoYesMangools plansNot published
AthenaHQListed in reviewYesNoStarter$295/mo
ProfoundEnterpriseEnterpriseNoEnterprise~$40k/yr

Who should pick which

If you want Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral measured the same way as ChatGPT, with citations and traffic next to them, start with Promptwatch. Trackbase suits an EU team on a small prompt budget that wants all eleven models. Superlines and AIclicks work if three engines at a time is enough and you'll rotate them. Atyla is the French-market pick at 149 EUR. Mangools makes sense if you're already a Mangools customer and DeepSeek doesn't matter. Skip any tool that can't tell you whether its Mistral or DeepSeek answers come from the app or the API.

The recommendation

Adding three more engines only helps if you can see what they cite and whether they send anyone. Otherwise it's three more lines on a chart. Promptwatch covers Grok, DeepSeek, and Mistral from the real interfaces on its first paid plan, then puts citation analytics, crawler logs, and AI-referred conversions on the same prompts. Run a month and check which of the three is worth your time: promptwatch.com.