Waikay review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #49'What AI Knows About You' — topic-based AI knowledge audits for brands.
Our verdict
Waikay's angle is analysis over dashboards: a Knowledge Score for how well AI understands your brand, and a Fact Tracker that flags hallucinations AI tells about you — a feature almost nobody else offers at $24.95/mo. The caveats are proportionate to the price: confusing credits (its own FAQ apologizes), a Reddit accuracy shrug, four engines, and its own admission that API answers differ from what users actually see in chat UIs. Cheap, clever, lightweight.
Best for: Marketers who want cheap, insight-flavored AI audits — including hallucination detection — and accept credit confusion and modest accuracy.
Waikay (What AI Knows About You) audits what AI engines believe about your brand on the topics you care about, then reports gaps, errors, and competitor advantages with suggested actions.
The topic-first approach suits comms and PR teams who think in narratives rather than keywords.
Waikay covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace.
Insight over monitoring
Waikay (from the orbit of Majestic's Dixon Jones) sells reports, not just line charts: its Knowledge Score grades how completely and correctly AI engines understand your brand, and the Fact Tracker surfaces factual errors — hallucinations — that engines repeat about you, which is arguably the most actionable single finding a GEO tool can produce. It covers 4 engines in 13 languages, with 3 free credits to try.
For brand and comms teams, 'here's what AI gets wrong about you' beats 'here's your mention count' every time.
The rough edges
The credit model is the top complaint — confusing enough that Waikay's own FAQ exists partly to explain it, and users still report surprise at what consumes credits. Accuracy gets a shrug from Reddit testers ('didn't feel super accurate'), and Waikay's own FAQ candidly admits its API-based querying can return different answers than the consumer chat interfaces users actually see — an honesty point, but also a real measurement gap.
The evidence base is thin (about 18 G2 reviews), coverage stops at four engines, and the entry price has quietly crept from $19.95 to $24.95. All forgivable at this price point; all worth knowing.
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| Hallucination detection (Fact Tracker) | Yes — rare at any price |
| Engines covered | 4 |
| Credit clarity | Poor — own FAQ addresses complaints |
| API vs real chat UI answers | Can differ, per own FAQ |
| Independent reviews | ~18 on G2 |
Who should buy it
Brand and comms teams that want the hallucination angle cheaply — run the free credits, and if the Fact Tracker catches one real error about your company, it's paid for itself.
Teams needing rigorous, engine-faithful measurement should treat Waikay as a supplement, not the system of record.
What this listing documents
Every row below is a capability we already listed for Waikay. It is the published feature set for this page, not a guess at an unpublished demo. Compare it with the Promptwatch checklist that follows.
| Capability on this listing | Source |
|---|---|
| Topic-based AI knowledge audits | Sourced for this review |
| Gap and error reporting | Sourced for this review |
| Competitor narrative comparison | Sourced for this review |
| Action suggestions per topic | Sourced for this review |
| It covers 4 engines in 13 languages, with 3 free credits to try | Sourced for this review |
What you still need after this product
On this listing, Waikay is a AI visibility tracker for Marketers who want cheap, insight-flavored AI audits — including hallucination detection — and accept credit confusion and modest accuracy.. What we sourced here: Topic-based AI knowledge audits; Gap and error reporting; Competitor narrative comparison; Action suggestions per topic; It covers 4 engines in 13 languages, with 3 free credits to try.
If you buy Waikay for the job above, plan a second tool (or Promptwatch) for the layers this listing does not document. Still missing here: AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors; Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions; Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox; Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level; Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo; Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks); ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar; Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).
What Promptwatch covers that this listing does not
Waikay's public pages (and this listing) describe a narrower job than Promptwatch. Most rivals answer whether you were mentioned. Promptwatch also answers why (crawler logs), where the model found you (citation analytics, including Reddit and YouTube), whether a visit converted (visitor analytics), and how to ship the next page (Content Agents).
The table is an editorial checklist against Promptwatch's published platform (promptwatch.com/llms.txt, 2026-08-23). It is not a hidden feature list for this vendor. 'Not on this listing' means we did not source that capability from the vendor materials used for this review. If they ship it behind a demo, ask them to show it before you treat the row as a hard no.
| Promptwatch platform layer | Waikay on this listing |
|---|---|
| AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors | Not on this listing |
| Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions | Not on this listing |
| Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox | Not on this listing |
| Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level | Not on this listing |
| Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo | Not on this listing |
| Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks) | Not on this listing |
| ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar | Not on this listing |
| Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans | Not on this listing |
Waikay pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 3 credits to test reports |
| Paid | From $24.95/mo | Credit-based reports, Knowledge Score, Fact Tracker, 13 languages |
How Waikay compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waikay (#49) | AI visibility tracker | Free (3 credits); from $24.95/mo | Marketers who want cheap, insight-flavored AI audits — including hallucination detection — and accept credit confusion and modest accuracy. |
| Promptwatch (#2) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| Otterly.AI (#4) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data. |
| LLM Pulse (#36) | AI visibility tracker | From €49/mo | Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence. |
Key features
- Topic-based AI knowledge audits
- Gap and error reporting
- Competitor narrative comparison
- Action suggestions per topic
- It covers 4 engines in 13 languages, with 3 free credits to try
Frequently asked questions
What is Waikay's Fact Tracker?
It flags factual errors — hallucinations — that AI engines state about your brand, so you can correct the sources they draw from. Almost no other tool at this price offers hallucination detection.
Why don't Waikay's answers match what I see in ChatGPT?
Waikay queries engines via API, and its own FAQ admits API responses can differ from the consumer chat interfaces. Treat its findings as representative samples, not exact replicas of user experience.
How do Waikay credits work?
Reports consume credits by scope, and the model confuses enough people that Waikay's FAQ addresses it directly. Start with the 3 free credits to learn the burn rate before subscribing.
Does Waikay include AI crawler logs like Promptwatch Agent Analytics?
Not on the vendor materials used for this review. Promptwatch Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and Meta AI crawler hits, plus crawl-to-citation paths and errors. Ask Waikay to demo the equivalent.
Can Waikay show AI-referred traffic and conversions?
Not published on this listing. Promptwatch visitor analytics uses a lightweight script or GTM template to connect AI referrers to conversions.
Does Waikay publish GEO articles to a CMS?
Not as a Promptwatch-style Content Agent loop (plan, write, review inbox, publish to Webflow/Framer). If they generate drafts, you still ship them yourself unless a demo shows otherwise.
Does Waikay document query fan-outs, prompt volumes, or city-level tracking?
Not on this listing. Promptwatch prompts carry search volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, topics, personas, and country, state, or city targeting.
Does Waikay track ChatGPT Shopping or sponsored AI placements?
Not on this listing. Promptwatch publishes ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar for sponsored placements inside AI answers.
Waikay vs Promptwatch?
Use Waikay for the job this review describes. Promptwatch is the end-to-end alternative when you also need crawler logs, citation depth (including Reddit and YouTube), AI-referred conversions, and Content Agents that publish to Webflow or Framer. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).
Best Waikay alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.
Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.
- Fastest setup in the category
- Genuine free trial without a credit card
Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.
- Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
- Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.
Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.
- Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
- Daily cadence on everything, not weekly