AI Search Tool Rank
Best AI search visibility tools
HubSpot AI Search Grader logo

HubSpot AI Search Grader review: pricing, features & alternatives

Ranked #86

Free instant snapshot of how AI engines see your brand — the zero-cost starting point.

Free checkerFree

Our verdict

The AEO Grader (rebranded from AI Search Grader in 2026) does exactly one thing at exactly the right price: a free, no-signup snapshot of how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini see your brand, scored out of 100. Treat it as a mirror, not a meter — scores drift between runs by design, the three engines have different knowledge cutoffs, and HubSpot's own disclaimer disclaims the results. The $50/mo AEO upsell has produced confidently wrong readings in testing; spend that on a real tracker.

Best for: Anyone wanting a zero-cost first snapshot of AI visibility — as a conversation starter, never as measurement.

HubSpot's AI Search Grader gives you a free, instant report on your brand's presence and sentiment in AI answers — no account gymnastics, just a snapshot with a shareable score.

It's the tool to run before buying anything else: if the grade surprises you, you have your business case for a real tracker.

HubSpot AI Search Grader covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace.

What the free tool does

Enter your brand and the grader runs test queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, returning a 0–100 score across five dimensions — sentiment (weighted up to 40 points), presence quality, brand recognition, share of voice, and market position — with a written interpretation. No account, no run cap, no cost. As an executive conversation-starter about AI visibility, it's the lowest-friction artifact in the category.

In 2026 it rebranded to 'AEO Grader' (the old URL redirects), part of HubSpot's push into answer-engine optimization after acquiring Xfunnel.

Why the numbers aren't measurement

Three structural issues cap its usefulness. Run-to-run variance: LLM outputs are stochastic, so your score changes on repeat runs — HubSpot's own disclaimer says results are not guaranteed. Mixed clocks: the engines carry different knowledge cutoffs (one GPT variant at Aug 2025, Gemini at Jan 2025, Perplexity live), so the sub-scores describe different moments in time, averaged as if they didn't. And the mention counts appear aggregated from indexed content rather than real query volume — the methodology is unpublished.

The paid path deserves its own caution: HubSpot AEO ($50/mo, 25 prompts, 28-day trial) is closed-loop — it sees only the prompts you load — and in one documented test reported 0% AI visibility for a domain that Semrush and Ahrefs simultaneously showed with real, healthy AI presence. Auto-generated competitor and persona setups also tested unreliable, needing manual correction.

CapabilityAEO GraderDedicated tracker
CostFree$20–200+/mo
Engines35–17+
History & trendsNoneDaily/weekly series
Custom promptsNoYes
Score stabilityVaries per runSampled & averaged

Who should use it

Everyone, once — it's free, instant, and the written readout is a decent executive artifact for starting the GEO conversation.

Nobody should track progress with it: run-to-run variance makes deltas meaningless, and the $50 upsell is weaker than dedicated trackers at the same price. Get your snapshot, then graduate.

What this listing documents

Every row below is a capability we already listed for HubSpot AI Search Grader. It is the published feature set for this page, not a guess at an unpublished demo. Compare it with the Promptwatch checklist that follows.

Capability on this listingSource
Instant AI visibility scoreSourced for this review
Brand sentiment snapshotSourced for this review
Share-of-voice estimateSourced for this review
Shareable reportSourced for this review

What you still need after this product

On this listing, HubSpot AI Search Grader is a Free checker for Anyone wanting a zero-cost first snapshot of AI visibility — as a conversation starter, never as measurement.. What we sourced here: Instant AI visibility score; Brand sentiment snapshot; Share-of-voice estimate; Shareable report.

If you buy HubSpot AI Search Grader for the job above, plan a second tool (or Promptwatch) for the layers this listing does not document. Still missing here: AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors; Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions; Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox; Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level; Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo; Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks); ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar; Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).

What Promptwatch covers that this listing does not

HubSpot AI Search Grader is a snapshot or grader, not a daily operations platform. Promptwatch is the paid measurement stack when you need history, crawler logs, visitor conversions, and content that ships from the same login.

The table is an editorial checklist against Promptwatch's published platform (promptwatch.com/llms.txt, 2026-08-23). It is not a hidden feature list for this vendor. 'Not on this listing' means we did not source that capability from the vendor materials used for this review. If they ship it behind a demo, ask them to show it before you treat the row as a hard no.

Promptwatch platform layerHubSpot AI Search Grader on this listing
AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errorsNot on this listing
Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversionsNot on this listing
Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inboxNot on this listing
Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite levelNot on this listing
Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geoNot on this listing
Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks)Not on this listing
ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads RadarNot on this listing
Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plansNot on this listing

HubSpot AI Search Grader pricing

PlanPriceWhat you get
AEO GraderFreeOne-shot score across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini; no account needed
HubSpot AEO$50/mo (28-day trial)~25 tracked prompts, weekly — closed-loop, verify against other tools

How HubSpot AI Search Grader compares

ToolCategoryPricingBest for
HubSpot AI Search Grader (#86)Free checkerFreeAnyone wanting a zero-cost first snapshot of AI visibility — as a conversation starter, never as measurement.
Promptwatch (#2)AI visibility platformFree tier; paid plans from $95/moTeams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
Profound (#1)Enterprise GEO platformFrom $99/mo (annual)Enterprise teams with the budget and a dedicated analyst to exploit the deepest dataset in the category.
AthenaHQ (#3)Enterprise GEO platformFree tier; from $295/moExecution-focused teams who will work an action queue daily — and who can stomach credit-based billing.

Key features

  • Instant AI visibility score
  • Brand sentiment snapshot
  • Share-of-voice estimate
  • Shareable report
Strengths
  • Completely free
  • Zero setup
  • Good conversation starter for budget
Limitations
  • One-shot snapshot: no history, no trends, no alerts, no custom prompts
  • Covers only 3 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) — no Claude, Copilot, Grok, AI Overviews, or AI Mode
  • Scores are stochastic — they vary between runs, and HubSpot's own disclaimer says results 'are not guaranteed'
  • Mixed knowledge cutoffs mean the three sub-scores measure different points in time
  • Mention counts appear derived from indexed content, not real query volume; methodology unpublished
  • The $50/mo paid upsell (HubSpot AEO) is closed-loop at ~25 prompts — one test showed 0% visibility for a domain other tools showed thriving
  • No published AI crawler-log product (Agent Analytics): you cannot see ChatGPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot hits, crawl-to-citation paths, or bot errors
  • No published visitor analytics that attribute AI-referred traffic to conversions (script or GTM)
  • No Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to Webflow/Framer with a review inbox

Frequently asked questions

Why does my score change every time I run it?

LLM outputs are stochastic and the grader takes single samples — HubSpot's own disclaimer says results aren't guaranteed. Differences between runs are mostly noise, which is why it can't measure progress.

Which engines does it actually check?

ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini only — no Claude, Copilot, Grok, AI Overviews, or AI Mode. And the engines carry different knowledge cutoffs, so the sub-scores describe different points in time.

Is the $50/mo HubSpot AEO worth it?

Rarely as a primary tool: it tracks only ~25 loaded prompts, and one test showed it reporting 0% visibility for a domain other platforms showed with healthy AI presence. At $50–100, dedicated trackers offer far more.

Does HubSpot AI Search Grader include AI crawler logs like Promptwatch Agent Analytics?

Not on the vendor materials used for this review. Promptwatch Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and Meta AI crawler hits, plus crawl-to-citation paths and errors. Ask HubSpot AI Search Grader to demo the equivalent.

Can HubSpot AI Search Grader show AI-referred traffic and conversions?

Not published on this listing. Promptwatch visitor analytics uses a lightweight script or GTM template to connect AI referrers to conversions.

Does HubSpot AI Search Grader publish GEO articles to a CMS?

Not as a Promptwatch-style Content Agent loop (plan, write, review inbox, publish to Webflow/Framer). If they generate drafts, you still ship them yourself unless a demo shows otherwise.

Does HubSpot AI Search Grader document query fan-outs, prompt volumes, or city-level tracking?

Not on this listing. Promptwatch prompts carry search volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, topics, personas, and country, state, or city targeting.

Does HubSpot AI Search Grader track ChatGPT Shopping or sponsored AI placements?

Not on this listing. Promptwatch publishes ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar for sponsored placements inside AI answers.

HubSpot AI Search Grader vs Promptwatch?

Use HubSpot AI Search Grader for the job this review describes. Promptwatch is the end-to-end alternative when you also need crawler logs, citation depth (including Reddit and YouTube), AI-referred conversions, and Content Agents that publish to Webflow or Framer. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).

Best HubSpot AI Search Grader alternatives

See all
Promptwatch logo

02AI visibility platform

Promptwatch

Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo

Full-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.

Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.

  • One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
  • Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
Read the full Promptwatch review
Profound logo

01Enterprise GEO platform

Profound

From $99/mo (annual)

The enterprise benchmark for AI search visibility, tracking every major engine daily across 50+ countries.

Best for: Enterprise teams with the budget and a dedicated analyst to exploit the deepest dataset in the category.

  • Deepest engine coverage in the category
  • Prompt Volumes is genuinely unique intelligence
Read the full Profound review
AthenaHQ logo

03Enterprise GEO platform

AthenaHQ

Free tier; from $295/mo

Action-oriented GEO platform from ex-Google Search and DeepMind engineers, with automated schema and entity tagging.

Best for: Execution-focused teams who will work an action queue daily — and who can stomach credit-based billing.

  • Best-in-class optimization workflow
  • Automated schema and entity tagging at scale
Read the full AthenaHQ review
Otterly.AI logo

04AI visibility tracker

Otterly.AI

From $29/mo

The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.

Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.

  • Fastest setup in the category
  • Genuine free trial without a credit card
Read the full Otterly.AI review