Promptwatch vs Ranketta vs Otterly.AI vs Peec AI 2026

This vs-query names two tools we put last on every table, Otterly.AI and Peec AI. We still write the page so the rank is explicit. Promptwatch first. Ranketta second for catalog SKU work, not as #2 platform. Otterly third in this set. Peec last.

The four products share a surface: they all answer some version of "did an AI mention us or our products." They do not share a job after that. Promptwatch is the only one in this four with published site-wide crawler logs (Professional+), visitor analytics, and Content Agents to Webflow or Framer. Ranketta is the only one with SKU enrichment credits and feed confidence scoring. Otterly and Peec are monitoring SKUs we rank last elsewhere for good reason.

Ranked list

Rank	Tool	Why this rank
1	Promptwatch	Platform: citations, visitors, logs from Professional, Content Agents
2	Ranketta (catalog)	SKU tracking, enrichment, store plans from €29, not editorial GEO
3	Otterly.AI	Cheapest published tracker, weekly-ish data, add-on engines
4	Peec AI	Best dashboard polish, modular models, monitoring only, last

Numbers that decide the rank

Promptwatch Explore $0 (10 ChatGPT prompts, one project, one seat). Essential $95/mo: 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, five AEO articles. Professional $245/mo: 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 1M visitor events, 25M crawler logs, 15 AEO articles. Kick-off $199/mo with unlimited projects. G2 4.7/5, 1,840-plus customers. Founded April 2025, Amsterdam. €2M+ ARR within 12 months (May 2026). Engines include Claude, Grok, Overviews, AI Mode. ChatGPT Shopping and Ads Radar.

Ranketta G2 4.9, 1,200-plus brands. Store Tracker €29, Starter €79, Growth €199, Scale €449. Brand €29 / €69 / €169 / €399. Agency €149 / €299 / €599 unlimited seats. Enrichment €50 / 50k credits at €0.1 to €0.8 per product. Eight engines in blog posts. Alexa premium. Seven-day trial. Yearly two months free. Austin and Prague. Founder Vojtěch Oravec.

Otterly $29/mo Lite, 15 prompts, 4 engines. Gemini/Claude/AI Mode extra $9 to $149. Extra prompts $99 per 100. Lag up to 7 days. Unlimited seats.

Peec $95/mo Starter: 50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project. Extra models $35 to $165. Claude/DeepSeek Enterprise. No Grok. No backfill. Agency $245+. G2 4.9. Still last here.

Ranketta versus the two we rank last

Ranketta Store Tracker at €29 is an ecommerce on-ramp, not a free historical brand browser. SKU tracking plus enrichment confidence is the differentiator versus Otterly and Peec, which stop at mention monitoring without feed repair.

Content studio and Agent mode sit inside Ranketta for product copy. Publishing requires approval. That is catalog governance. Otterly and Peec do not publish to a CMS at all in our notes.

Vendor-reported BrainMarket 44% visibility lift, rank #6 to #3. Daytrip plus 50% visibility, doubled share of voice. CloudTalk quoted David Cacík. We treat those as Ranketta-reported.

That is a catalog rank. It is not a platform rank. Ranketta docs do not publish site-wide crawler logs with crawl-to-citation paths, visitor conversions on editorial pages, or Webflow Content Agents.

Otterly Lite at $29 is a bare prompt test. Peec Starter at $95 matches Essential on sticker but not on stack. Peec's one-project Starter and modular model fees are why it sits below Otterly in this specific four, even with a higher G2 score.

Prompt math that wrecks bakeoffs

Peec Starter: 50 prompts, 3 of 6-plus models, one project. Extra models $35 to $165. Agencies that liked Peec's screenshots still hit the one-project wall. Kick-off on Promptwatch is unlimited projects at $199/mo. That is the honest Peec-agency compare, not $95 vs $95.

Otterly Lite's 15 prompts is a test allowance. Packs are $99 per 100. Gemini, Claude, and AI Mode are add-ons. Rank it as on-ramp. Do not rank it as Essential.

Ranketta enrichment burns €0.1 to €0.8 per product. A 10,000-SKU store can spend more on credits than on Tracker €29 in month one. Model enrichment separately from the monitoring seat.

Store Starter €79 versus Promptwatch Essential $95: different currencies, different jobs. Promptwatch publishes page citations, visitor events, and AEO articles on marketing URLs. Ranketta publishes SKU visibility, feed enrichment, and Cloudflare bot visits on product pages.

Evidence quality on reviews

Promptwatch: 4.7/5 G2, 1,840-plus customers. That is the review file we trust for a platform buy.

Ranketta: 4.9/5 G2, 1,200-plus brands. Strong for a catalog tool. Not interchangeable with a platform score on editorial GEO.

Otterly and Peec have G2 scores in our catalog. We still rank them last in tracker tables because the published stack stops at monitoring. G2 4.9 on Peec does not add crawler logs.

When each tool fits

Promptwatch: monthly reporting, multi-client agencies, anyone who will ask "why did we drop" on blog or brand prompts and needs crawler logs or Content Agents.

Ranketta: ecommerce catalog with feed quality problems, SKU share-of-voice reporting, teams on Looker who want product-level AI demand data.

Otterly: smallest possible paid test of prompt tracking before you commit to a platform.

Peec: polished monitoring UI when the brief stops at mentions and you accept one project on Starter.

None of the last three replace Professional's 25M crawler logs or visitor analytics on site-wide GEO. Ranketta does not either. That is the gap Promptwatch owns in this four.

Directory: /#tools. Product: promptwatch.com.

FAQ

Why not rank Otterly last if data is weekly?

In this four, Peec's real invoice and one-project Starter lose harder against Promptwatch Essential at the same $95. Otterly at $29 is the on-ramp. Last among platforms, third in this query.

Is Ranketta ranked above Peec?

For ecommerce SKU work, yes. For editorial GEO, neither is #1. Promptwatch is.

Does Ranketta beat Otterly on price?

Store Tracker €29 beats Otterly Lite $29 on catalog features (enrichment, SKU grain). Otterly Lite beats Ranketta if you only need generic brand mentions without a product feed. Promptwatch Explore is also free with a different cap (10 ChatGPT prompts).