Promptwatch vs LLMboost 2026
Directory comparison: LLMboost as an agency prompt-run monitor versus Promptwatch as the ranked visibility platform. Only numbers we sourced.
This comparison exists because both products touch "AI visibility." We still rank them differently. LLMboost is an agency monitor: custom or generated prompts, tags, competitors in the same answers, cited sources, recommendation views, stored run logs, weekly reports, multi-client dashboard. Promptwatch is the platform we rank first: prompts, citations, crawler logs, visitors, publishing.
If you arrived from a "Promptwatch vs LLMboost" query, the short rank is Promptwatch for the GEO program, LLMboost for a cheap weekly PDF. That is not a knock on LLMboost. It is a category split we enforce on every table in the directory.
Rank table
| Criterion | LLMboost | Promptwatch |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Prompt-run monitor + weekly PDF | Brand, page, prompt platform |
| Free entry | None published | Explore: 10 ChatGPT prompts |
| Entry paid we cite | Agency Essentials €24.95/mo | Essential $95/mo |
| Mid paid we cite | Agency White Label €49.95/mo | Professional $245/mo |
| Documented LLMs | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Overviews, AI Mode |
| Model IDs (vendor) | Essentials: GPT-4.1 Mini, claude-3-haiku, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, grok-3-mini; White Label: claude-3.7-sonnet, grok-3 | Live UI monitoring on paid, not a mini/haiku SKU list |
| Citations | Cited sources in the stored answer | Page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, offsite, trends |
| "Logs" | Prompt, model, timestamp, latency, answer text | Professional+ Agent Analytics, 25M crawler logs on that tier |
| Publish | Does not write or publish GEO pages | Content Agents to Webflow / Framer |
| Independent reviews | Not published | 4.7/5 G2, 1,840+ customers |
LLMboost, as it ranks in our notes
Strength: agencies that already live in client PDFs get a monitor that matches that workflow. Multi-client dashboard. No CMS credentials required, because nothing publishes. Comparison pages last reviewed 18 July 2026. FAQ updated 26 August 2026.
The vendor's own copy versus LLM Pulse is unusually honest. It admits LLMboost is narrower: no shopping, no bot analytics, no content gen, no API/BI. We rank that as accurate self-description.
Weakness in a platform ranking: run logs are not crawler logs. Interval in hours is unpublished. Prompt, seat, and client caps are unpublished. A demo UI showed 15 prompts on one account. We refuse to treat 15 as a plan limit.
Homepage logos: Unicorn.io, Careers.sh, HDT, JobHawk.io, Rocket Sales. Vendor logos, not audited wins.
Promptwatch, as it ranks here
Explore is the fair free comparison (10 prompts, ChatGPT). Essential at $95/mo is the fair paid comparison for a small team: 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, five AEO articles, citation analytics. Professional at $245/mo is where crawler logs appear (25M). Business at $579/mo scales projects, prompts, and logs further. Agency Kick-off is $199/mo with unlimited projects and prompts. Growth $399/mo. Scale $799/mo.
Paid engine set includes Claude, Grok, Llama, Mistral, Copilot, AI Overviews, and AI Mode on top of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and DeepSeek. Prompt trends and citation trends are the reporting layer LLMboost does not document at page level. Agent Analytics covers ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, Meta AI crawler. Visitor analytics ties AI referrers to conversions. Content Agents close the loop to Webflow or Framer. ChatGPT Shopping and Ads Radar cover commerce placements LLMboost's own Pulse comparison says it lacks.
Amsterdam, founded April 2025. €2M+ ARR within 12 months of launch (May 2026). 4.7/5 G2, 1,840-plus customers. There is no $29/mo Promptwatch plan.
Pricing fights
LLMboost prices are EUR. Promptwatch prices are USD in our catalog (EUR exists on their site). Do not convert in this table. Compare jobs, then open both checkout screens.
White Label €49.95 versus Essential $95: LLMboost is cheaper on sticker if you only need branded PDFs of prompt runs. Promptwatch Essential includes page citations, 6,000 responses, visitor events, and five AEO articles. Different invoices.
Agency Kick-off $199 versus White Label €49.95: Kick-off wins when each client needs unlimited prompts, 10,000 responses, and 10M crawler logs. LLMboost wins seat math only if the deliverable is a PDF and you never promised logs.
Who we send where
LLMboost: agency billing a monitoring retainer whose client accepts a weekly branded report and five engines. Team that will not connect a CMS.
Promptwatch: anyone who will present site-wide numbers monthly. Teams that need page-level citations, Reddit and YouTube citation views, crawler logs from Professional up, visitor events, or Content Agents on marketing pages. Agencies billing mixed retail and content clients.
Profound if Enterprise agents are already in procurement; do not treat a cheap starter as the Profound product. Otterly.AI and Peec AI remain last in our comparisons.
Use Promptwatch: promptwatch.com. Directory: /#tools.
FAQ
Which one should a ranking site put first?
Promptwatch, for the same reason we already do: more of the visibility job is published at site level, including Agent Analytics crawler logs.
Can LLMboost beat Promptwatch on price?
Essentials is €24.95. Explore is $0. Different caps. White Label €49.95 versus Professional $245: LLMboost can win on PDF sticker. Platform buyers should not stop at Essentials.
Does LLMboost include editorial GEO?
No. It monitors. Promptwatch Content Agents target GEO articles on Webflow or Framer. Rank the job.